Ed Balls dishonours dead child for political gain
What can you say about Ed Balls that hasn’t been said before and that doesn’t involve the kind of language that I wouldn’t want my daughter to read … not that she’s old enough to understand the words I want to use about him right now, but you gentle reader would … well maybe not ALL of them, but I wouldn’t want you looking up the more obscure ones either.
He is a LIAR.
A soulless, twisted man who has no compunction about using a dead child to further his anti-family, anti-home education agenda. I had thought it was impossible to loath him more than I already did, but you know what, I was wrong!
Do not read the following if you suffer from high blood pressure, a weak heart, are near to anything breakable or within hearing of anyone who doesn’t need to be learning to swear just yet.
Secretary of State’s response to verdicts in the Khyra Ishaq case
If you missed the debate about Serious Case Reviews in the Commons on Tuesday it might be worth a read because in it you will find how utterly WORTHLESS an “executive summary” of a SCR is. Balls uses the words “full and detailed” to describe a SUMMARY which will be NEITHER.
On a cheerier note I bet he’s a bit disappointed that only the BBC seems interested in playing his tune on this one today.
bubble Said on February 25th, 2010 at 5:47 pm quote
Graham Badman been on BBC News 24 as well using that poor child to further his anti-family, anti-home education agenda. no one was on they to counter what he was saying!
Ciaran Said on February 25th, 2010 at 6:09 pm quote
Shameful. But then Brown did just did the same with his own child, so I suppose he’s just following his leader.
Firebird Said on February 25th, 2010 at 6:39 pm quote
Good point Ciaran! Did you see Balls on the 6pm news, smug even by his usual standards!