<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So what was Schedule 1 about really?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swsurrey-home-ed.co.uk/wordpress/2010/04/08/so-what-was-schedule-1-about-really/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swsurrey-home-ed.co.uk/wordpress/2010/04/08/so-what-was-schedule-1-about-really/</link>
	<description>The blog of the South West Surrey Home Educators Group</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: emma</title>
		<link>http://www.swsurrey-home-ed.co.uk/wordpress/2010/04/08/so-what-was-schedule-1-about-really/#comment-3727</link>
		<dc:creator>emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swsurrey-home-ed.co.uk/wordpress/?p=791#comment-3727</guid>
		<description>It wasn't about any of them. IMO it was about scapegoating EHE law in the Khyra Ishaq trial to get Birmingham Childrens Services off the hook.

If that juror hadn't got ill, or whatever it was that paused the trial in June 2009, we would not have stood a chance of getting the legislation stopped and the whitewash exposed.

I am very very interested in the Sharon Shoesmith Haringay cover-up scapegoating (with a report by our very own Graham B commissioned by our dear friend Ed B) now being exposed in the courts. I think this was intended to be the same sort of thing, and I don't think EITHER of the whitewashes was ever supposed to be exposed as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t about any of them. IMO it was about scapegoating EHE law in the Khyra Ishaq trial to get Birmingham Childrens Services off the hook.</p>
<p>If that juror hadn&#8217;t got ill, or whatever it was that paused the trial in June 2009, we would not have stood a chance of getting the legislation stopped and the whitewash exposed.</p>
<p>I am very very interested in the Sharon Shoesmith Haringay cover-up scapegoating (with a report by our very own Graham B commissioned by our dear friend Ed B) now being exposed in the courts. I think this was intended to be the same sort of thing, and I don&#8217;t think EITHER of the whitewashes was ever supposed to be exposed as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubble</title>
		<link>http://www.swsurrey-home-ed.co.uk/wordpress/2010/04/08/so-what-was-schedule-1-about-really/#comment-3651</link>
		<dc:creator>bubble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swsurrey-home-ed.co.uk/wordpress/?p=791#comment-3651</guid>
		<description>recevied today this letter to Peter

Dear Master Williams

Thank you for your letter of 18th of March 2010 about home education which has been passed to me for reply.
Our propsoals to Legislate for a light touch registration and monitoring scheme for home educating families have now been removed from the Children,Schools and Families Billl to enable some parts of the Bill to be passed into law before Parliament is dissolved.
However ,government remains committed to introducing such a scheme and to the provision of additional support for home educating families.
Yours sincerely
Jill Clark
independent Education and School Governance
She from the DCSf! bet that hurt to write that letter to Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>recevied today this letter to Peter</p>
<p>Dear Master Williams</p>
<p>Thank you for your letter of 18th of March 2010 about home education which has been passed to me for reply.<br />
Our propsoals to Legislate for a light touch registration and monitoring scheme for home educating families have now been removed from the Children,Schools and Families Billl to enable some parts of the Bill to be passed into law before Parliament is dissolved.<br />
However ,government remains committed to introducing such a scheme and to the provision of additional support for home educating families.<br />
Yours sincerely<br />
Jill Clark<br />
independent Education and School Governance<br />
She from the DCSf! bet that hurt to write that letter to Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danae</title>
		<link>http://www.swsurrey-home-ed.co.uk/wordpress/2010/04/08/so-what-was-schedule-1-about-really/#comment-3631</link>
		<dc:creator>Danae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swsurrey-home-ed.co.uk/wordpress/?p=791#comment-3631</guid>
		<description>Yes, indeed.

They're reverting to what they think will give them victory next time. They are really vile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, indeed.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re reverting to what they think will give them victory next time. They are really vile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

